Comments (11)Add a Comment
Attkisson won high awards for exposing corruption, including Hillary's lie about being under fire in Bosnia (Attkisson was there). For her exposés of Fast & Furious, Benghazi, Obamacare, Obama's cyberattacks on Americans, plus much more, see my comment to her book STONEWALLED at this library (or at www.jocolibrary.org).
--- The most common Liberal smear is mocking disparagement without specific facts. There are many such smears against Trump. They scoff and jeer, lament his awfulness, all without specific allegations. They talk of "our" disgust with Trump, of how "we" must stop him, as if everyone shared their own narrow views. They cry "racist", "alt right", etc. They call Trump a press-endangering fascist, after Obama had the most intrusive, press-hounding tenure ever, spying on ALL Americans, seizing reporters' records, and punishing whistleblowers.
--- Liberals use ridicule to the fullest. If you don't think sodomy is beautiful, and two husbands make a married couple, then you are a stupid homophobic jerk, and your views are abhorrent. If you dissent from any Liberal dogma (such as the statistical certainty that Hillary would win the election), you are against Science.
--- Democrats denounced Nixon for taping Oval Office conversations, after Kennedy and Johnson had done the same thing. They smeared Judge Bork for such sins as keeping pregnant women from working near harmful chemicals.
--- Hillary and other feminists smeared Bill's women. A tape recording and semen-stained dress forced him to confess his lies about Gennifer Flowers & Monica Lewinsky.
--- Republicans lied outrageously to smear war-critics: If you don't believe in Saddam's WMD, you're a fool. If you don't want to wreck Iraq, you're a coward and a traitor. They badly smeared John Kerry in 2004. He was clearly more fit to command than Bush, who had evaded combat and launched the war with lies.
--- By 2008, David Brock (rightwinger turned gay leftwinger) was Clinton smear-chief. He got huge salaries from vicious front-groups which the Media upheld as neutral monitoring organizations. Brock supported Obama's massive spying on journalists.
--- Political and corporate smear-firms have network moles who report pending exposés, which are then countered with threats of product-disparagement, boycotts, lawsuits, and blackmail of journalists and news execs. Solid stories are cancelled. Obama tried to stop Attkisson's Fast and Furious exposé, which went on to win high awards. Boeing threatened all who reported its Dreamliner battery fires. A beverage group attacked Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Brock pre-smeared the author of CLINTON CASH, which detailed payoffs to Hillary for trade approvals.
--- Lib Media issued Dem-written stories as if independently produced. Newsmen sought prior Dem approval of their own stories. The Clintons lashed NBC for going off-script. John Harwood chaired a debate while secretly coaching Hillary.
--- A Clintonite tied Obama to bomber Bill Ayers and anti-US Reverend Wright. Obama called Bill Clinton a racist. Hillary pretended a video had sparked the Benghazi attack, and cynically vowed to pursue the video-maker. The Media falsely reported that Michael Brown had been shot after surrendering; enraged Blacks killed policemen.
--- Whistleblowers smeared by Obamists as cranks and liars, sued successfully. To hide its Fast And Furious program of guns for drug gangs, Obama's DOJ claimed a whistleblower ran guns and threatened to prosecute him. Eric Holder suppressed records and was held in contempt of Congress.
--- The Clintons told reporters to ignore the diary of ambassador Stevens, killed at Benghazi, in which he complained of Hillary's failure to provide adequate security. Michael Hastings refused to back off.
----- CONTINUES under Audio entry at this library (or at www.jocolibrary.org).
Under "How to discern what is Fake News 101" should be listed this book. Sheryl Attkisson has learned the hard way about mainstream media lies, censorship, and propaganda. She gets it. And she understood the vaccine travesty way before other journalists. It is past time for the public to wake up to the truth about smear campaigns and propaganda media lies about this and move on into a new future where we have our own sources that we vett and trust ourselves. I have access to my President on Twitter every day...and every member of Congress if I wish. I have every journalist. Every trend setter. I am smarter than the Mockingbird media and more discerning. CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS...they are useless and irrelevent. Social media is a propaganda tool - we can't use that anymore. Alt media through Youtube, Gab, Real, Voat, Reddit...and others are where we get reliable news. If that is news to you - then you should probably go back and reread Sheryl's book with a more open and unaffiliated mind.
[Update: For the immediate commenter below:
On 12/29/12, President Obama signed HR 4310, the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act. Section 1078 (thomas.loc. gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.4310
of the bill authorizes the use of propaganda inside the US, which had previously been banned since 1948 when the Smith-Mundt Act was passed.
[Update: For the commenter, Lunabianca: I've never viewed Fox // News \\ and as I have mentioned in several previous book reviews, there is no such thing as a Fox News since Murdoch's News Corporation successfully won several federal lawsuits whereby the courts ruled it was legal to fictionalize the news in America. Since the past president, Barack Obama, signed legislation legalizing the government to propagandize the public, something which had previously been illegal in America, there are no official media conduits [save the occasional KPFA show from Berkeley] in America. Perhaps you believe every neocon who claims to be a democrat, such as the Clintons and Obama, because you have never familiarized yourself with their political records, which is indicative of a very lazy person!]
Amazing! I have never, ever heard of this // investigative journalist \\ - - wonder why that would be? Perhaps since she has never exposed any real facts; something which would stick in one's mind?
Did she uncover George W. Bush's actual non-existent military record? Did she uncover serious facts which the Fake News refused to cover in the assassinations of President Kennedy, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Sen. Bobby Kennedy?
@StarGladiator or others who know where following statement came from:
Could you elaborate your statement "Barack Obama, signed legislation legalizing the government to propagandize the public, something which had previously been illegal in America,"
An excellent book by one of the few remaining journalists who still investigates and researches her topics. Whether you are liberal or conservative, there are many organizations out to influence you. If you want to understand how you are being "managed", read this book.
“If Sharyl Attkisson’s Such a Fair Reporter, Why Is Right-Wing Media Defending Her?”
by Terry Krepel, posted November 20, 2014, at HuffPost
“Sharyl Attkisson and Full Measure are pushing the "Big Tech is censoring Conservatives" lie”
by xaxnar, posted January 10, 2021, at Daily Kos
and, not surprisingly,
#457 in the Encyclopedia of American Loons
“Sharyl Attkisson Got A Show After Years Of Pushing Misinformation And Conspiracies”
by Hannah Groch-Begley, posted October 2, 2015 at Media Matters For America
“More embarrassing anti-vaccine reporting from CBS News's Sharyl Attkisson”
by Seth Mnookin, posted March 31, 2011
“Sharyl Attkisson and CBS News: An epic fail in reporting on the murder of autistic teen Alex Spourdalakis”
by David Gorski, posted September 2, 2013, at Science-Based Medicine
“Disgraced CBS Reporter Resigns Causing Fox News To Weep (And Lie About Benghazi)”
by Mark NC, posted March 12, 2014
as if anybody cares what the "Moonie Times" thinks !!
When one tries to get a balanced view of The News, what one hears more and more of is a conspiracy of the Leftist Media, C.I.A., and F.B.I. What a cabal they must be. This book along with "Rogue Spooks," by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, offers evidence that this cabal is in cahoots to overthrow Democracy and enshrine the threat of Liberalism, Socialism and FDR economics. One can read these books for a equal point of view and then discard, or examine points, based on pragmatic empirical sense. My observation of these two books is that they seem to be blatantly biased to an end that has no currency. All they do is point fingers at the windmills that blow fresh air, left and right. A metaphoric, practical resolution was hoped for but is sadly lacking.
This book was a terrible disappointment! The SMEAR was just another example of propaganda. While the summery on the book flap says that it gives an account of how "corporations and both sides of the political isle" are using smear tactics, its focus is biased and one sided. On page 250, the author writes "Suffice to say those accused of producing or being fake news tend to define it in terms that exclude themselves and point to the other guys" This describes Attkisson book. NOT WORTH READING!!!
@Star Gladiator -- do you actually READ books before commenting? I noticed Fox News talking points posing as a "review" under the new book about Hilary Clinton too. Or shall we simply label your posts FAKE REVIEWS?